Countries like Switzerland or Canada have such a history. There are other jurisdictions where people and organizations historically have been untrustworthy.Īnd then there are organizations and countries with a long history of rule of law, prudence and privacy. Why don’t they make sense? An American company cannot be trusted (by law, they are unable to protect their customers’ privacy as they are compelled to do what secret courts tell them to do without disclosing the requests to the client or the public). People should go in to Spark with their eyes very wide open.Īlec, in a post-Snowden world your comments do not make sense. So I wouldn’t have an issue with Spark if Readdle didn’t force you to hand over your email credentials, i.e. ![]() I haven’t looked into the fouders of Readdle but I have seen dealt with their now-you-see-it, now-you-don’t weird pricing model on PDF Expert which is now subscription only on iOS. Readdle fails on location (Ukraine ranks right up at the top in terms of corruption and per-capita hacking/criminal activity). the built-in security (if the company loses your credentials to a disgruntled employee or a hacker, their good ethics don’t count).If it’s a foreign company, it depends on three variables: If it’s an American company, as reputable and of high character as the founders may be, they are vulnerable under the Patriot Act which requires them to hand over your credentials and not tell you or anyone else. I would think long and hard about allowing any company to store my email credentials. If you are okay with a Ukrainian private company storing your email credentials on their servers, good for you. Thank you for providing links with your comment. As it is false that Spark has a security problem regarding the stored credentials. The only stuff to look at is the stuff from today, October 8 it all happened today.This is definitely false. I’ll pass along the diagnostic report, as this includes the logs with the import error messages. One final thought: I think from an instructional point of view, if you were saying that copying the Imap mailbox into On My Mac would cause the messages to be completely downloaded and copied into the On My Mac copy, it might be good to stop giving that advice, as it did not work that way at all exporting the On My Mac copy into EagleFiler worked much worse than exporting the Imap original, because the latter caused attachment complaints about roughly five messages, whereas the former cause a missing message complaint about 60 messages. The upshot is that we should probably call it a day on this, but it wasn’t wasted I learned a lot. ![]() Other (smaller) mailboxes on the same server exported just fine, but in general they were not so attachment-filled. ![]() Having successfully (I believe) copied the messages into EagleFiler, I think I’m going to stop. We may never know what the weirdness is/was. Your explanation about the attachments being separate is also a perfect explanation of why we’d need to make a whole different mailbox in a different venue in order to capture whatever weirdness is going on. partial and when not it isn’t, for instance, whether there is an attachment. In this or any of my Imap mailboxes, some messages are. In that case I think the export has been successful, though it sure was a lot harder than I expected. I think you’re absolutely right about the duplicates having something to do with the numeric discrepancy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |